Quiet Time Notes

Notes from my daily Quiet Times with God

New Testament Reliability

March 1st, 2025
Previous | Next

Historical tests all old documents are given. How well does the Bible do?

Questions:

  1. Do we have early testimony?
  2. Do we have eyewitness testimony?
  3. Do we testimony from multiple independant sources?
  4. Are the eyewitness trustworthy?
  5. Do we have corroborating evidence from archaeology?
  6. Do we have enemy attestation?
  7. Does the tesitmony contain details of embarrassing to authors?

Common Objections:

History cannot be known - science does not apply because it is not repeatable

Must use the same evidence as a standard jury would determine a case - beyound a reasonable doubt: peicing together evidence and interviewing witnesses

New Testament is Bias

They were biased but that does mean they lied or exaggerated

What did they have to gain from an outside perpective?

Why would Jews who converted to Christianity risk presecution, death, eternal damnation if it was not true?

The New Testament writers must have very strong evidence to turn away from ancient beliefs and practices

Converted People are Not Objective

Atheist are not neutral either

Most authors believe what they are writting but that does not mean what they write is wrong or has no objective element


Key Phrase: The New Testament writers must have very strong evidence to turn away from ancient beliefs and practices

Notes from: I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist by Frank Turek.


Start with a Topic
Search Bible